![Elife endnote format](https://knopkazmeya.com/10.png)
![elife endnote format elife endnote format](https://kulibrary.files.wordpress.com/2022/09/en-x9-create3.png)
When papers are sent for external review, the choice of reviewers is made by the Associate Editor and may include reviewers suggested by the authors during the submission process. Papers may be rejected without external review if the Associate Editor, together with a Science Editor or the Editor in Chief, determines that the study does not significantly advance the field or the subject material is inappropriate for the JCI’s readership. The Science Editors assign manuscripts to appropriate Associate Editors.
ELIFE ENDNOTE FORMAT FULL
Decisions on such inquiries are not a substitute for peer review but are intended to provide informal guidance to authors in determining where to submit their research for full peer review. Inquiries should include the manuscript abstract and a statement detailing the reasons why the manuscript might be of interest to the Journal’s readership. In general, responses are sent after evaluation of the written material and subsequent discussion by the Editorial Board.Īuthors may submit inquiries to JCI Insight regarding manuscripts of potential suitability. Questions concerning editorial policies or decisions should be addressed to the Science Editors at Other members of the Editorial Board do not take calls or written inquiries from authors concerning decisions or other editorial matters. If you do not have this information, provide the manuscript title and corresponding author’s name. For any communication with us, reference the assigned tracking number as noted in the Journal’s acknowledgment of your submission. Questions regarding manuscript handling and status should be addressed to To avoid the possibility of misinterpretation and/or errors in communication, the Journal will typically communicate only with the corresponding author. For more information, contact JCI Insight The Journal does not consider unsolicited manuscripts in non-research categories such as Review, Viewpoint, or Commentary. These articles are expected to have wide-ranging impact, enhance our understanding of disease, and spur future research in the field. Manuscripts reporting a new technological advance or model system should present evidence of an interesting biological insight, as well as demonstrating that the technology or model is an advance over the status quo. Manuscripts reporting major databases should include new insights derived from the database and/or provide a rationale for why it provides a unique and valuable resource.
![elife endnote format elife endnote format](https://files.rcsb.org/pub/pdb/validation_reports/og/6og7/6og7_multipercentile_validation.png)
Research manuscripts provide substantial new mechanistic insights into biology and disease.
ELIFE ENDNOTE FORMAT HOW TO
JCI Insight considers research submissions in the following categoriesĬlick the category name for formatting instructions or go to How to submit your manuscript for the first time (new windows).
![elife endnote format elife endnote format](https://files.rcsb.org/pub/pdb/validation_reports/al/6alf/6alf_multipercentile_validation.png)
Research and Resource and Technical Advance.Preparing your first-submission manuscript.What to have available during the online submission process.How to submit your manuscript for the first time (new window).Why submit your manuscript to JCI Insight?.Revised July 18, 2022 | Revision history Navigate to
![Elife endnote format](https://knopkazmeya.com/10.png)